Team II Comparative Genomics Group

Team 2: Comparative Genomics

Team Members: Kara Keun Lee, Courtney Astore, Kristine Lacek, Ujani Hazra, Jayson Chao

---

Introduction

What is Comparative Genomics?

Once genomes are fully assembled and annotated, outbreak analysis can begin via comparative genomics. Generally, metadata ascertained from gene prediction and annotation can be used to map the relatedness of multiple isolates. Combined with epidemiological data, a given outbreak can be mapped back to a particular source (patient zero), and tracked to determine which strains are outbreak isolates and which are sporadic cases. Furthermore, phenotypic features such as virulence, antibiotic resistence, and pathogenicity can be determined. Compilation of these data allow for recommendations to be made on behalf of human impact, treatment strategy, and management methods to address further spread.

Our Data

Our genomic data comes from 50 isolates of C. jejuni from an outbreak of foodbourne illnesses.

Our epidemiological data includes

Objectives

• Identify kinds of strains (outbreak vs. sporadic)​

• Construct phylogeny demonstrating which isolates are related and which differ​

• Determine source of outbreak​

• Map virulence and antibiotic resistence features of outbreak isolates​

• Compile recommendations for outbreak response and treatment

Overview of Techniques

When performing phylogenomics, there are many options by which one can classify similarities and differences across the genome. Our approach utilizes tools from three different techniques.

MLST

MLST or Multi-locus Sequence Typing​ identifies a set of loci (housekeeping genes) in the genome and compares each locus in a genome against the set of loci. It estimates the relationships between bacteria based on allelic variations in specific loci than their nucleotide sequences.​ MLST data can be used to investigate evolutionary relationships among bacteria. However, the sequence conservation of the housekeeping genes limits the discriminatory power of MLST in differentiating bacterial strains.

There are several types of MLST:

Whole-genome MLST (wgMLST): All loci of a given isolate compared to equivalent loci in other isolates (typing scheme based on a few thousand genes).

• Creates wgMLST tree (different styles exist)​
  • Minimum spanning tree = circles with sizes indicative of frequency of ST and distance showed on connecting lines

Core-genome MLST (cgMLST): Focused on only the core elements of the genomes of a group of bacteria (typing scheme based on a few hundred genes).

• 7-Gene MLST: Chooses 7 loci in the genome and compare all genomes to these 7 loci.​
  • Profile of alleles (“sequence type” or ST) by calling the alleles​
  • Genome assembly optional – there are assembly free methods​​
  • Creates a phylogeny​

Ribosomal MLST (rMLST): Based on 53 loci that code for ribosomal proteins present in most bacteria​.

Database: PubMLST

PubMLST (Public databases for molecular typing and microbial genome diversity) for Campylobacter jejuni/coli (as of 17MAR2020):

• 98,017 isolates
• 50,138 genomes
• 1,286,733 alleles

Tool: stringMLST

stringMLST is a tool for detecting the MLST of an isolate directly from the genome sequencing reads.

• Predicts the ST of an isolate in a completely assembly and alignment free manner
• Downloads and builds databases from pubMLST using the most recent allele and profile definitions
• Faster algorithm compared to traditional MLST tools that maintains high accuracy​

Tool: MentaLiST

A k-mer based MLST caller designed specifically for handling large MLST schemes.

• Capable of dealing with MLST schemes with up to thousands of genes while requiring limited computational resources
• MLST calling that does not require pre-assembled genomes, working directly with the raw WGS data, and also avoids costly pre-processing steps (i.e. contig assembly or read mapping onto a reference​)
• Follows the general principle of k-mer counting, introduced in stringMLST, with some data compression improvements that lead to much smaller database sizes and a faster running time

SNP-based

SNP stands for Single Nucleotide Polymorphism, meaning that certain alleles have two or three possibilities as to which base is at a given locus. As SNPs accumulate through de novo mutations and are passed down through generations, comparing a given isolate's SNPs to other isolates and a reference genome allow ascertainment of phylogenetic distance between samples(1). Tools have been developed to compare bases position by position (SNP-calling) and create matrices to compute relatedness between samples based on common SNPs.

Generalized Algorithm Overview:

• Pre-processing and read cleaning
• Mapping
• SNP calling against reference genome
• Phylogeny generation based on SNP profiles

Tools to be tested:

• kSNP3.0 (2)
• Lyve-SET (3)

Works Cited

​ 1.https://cba.anu.edu.au/news-events/snps-population-and-phylo-genomics​

2.https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article/31/17/2877/183216​

3.https://github.com/lskatz/lyve-SET.Katz et al. (2017) A comparative analysis of the Lyve-SET phylogenomics pipeline for genomic epidemiology for foodborne pathogens. Frontiers in Microbiology 8: 375.​

​